By Evan Johnston
The Scarborough shooting in the Morningside neighborhood late Monday night has left the community shaken to its core. Shyanne Charles, 14, and Joshua Yasay, 23, were killed at a block party on Danzig Street, near Morningside Drive and Lawrence Avenue. 26 others – including an infant – were injured after an altercation led to an exchange of gunfire.
As Toronto has begun to reflect on this terrible tragedy, a profoundly racist discourse has emerged in the public discussion of the event, with social media buzzing with various forms of victim blaming. It’s the fault of absent black fathers and the lack of a traditional family in the black community, some say. It’s the result of a romanticized ‘gangbanger’ attitude and therefore their own fault for participating, say others.
In each different variation, people are blaming the victims of Monday’s gun violence, arguing that it’s an inevitable result of people ‘embracing a ghetto lifestyle’.
Less overtly racist responses have tended to focus on either the movement of illegal guns across the border, or on the lack of police presence in the Morningside community. But as one Toronto resident tweeted, “Poverty is the proximate cause. Not border control, not gangs, not the police.”
Scarborough is being left behind, and one only has to take a quick look at the numbers to understand the unequal conditions that are giving rise to these forms of gang violence. According to United Way statistics, from 1981 to 2001, there’s been a 136.6 percent growth in poor families in Scarborough. As of 2001, 83 percent of poor families are families of colour, while 64 percent are immigrant families.
In the Morningside neighbourhood where Danzig is located, 51.3 of individuals 15 and older are classified as low-income, and 56.6 percent in neighbouring West Hill. All of these statistics were collected before the economic crisis that began in 2007-8 recession, and the inequality in these neighbourhoods has likely only grown more acute.
According to Respect Scarborough, a grassroots organization formed in 2011, “Large factories which once provided well-paying, permanent jobs have been closing up, going bankrupt, or shifting production south of the border (or overseas). Good jobs are harder and harder to find because of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the rising value of the dollar, and globalization.” Low-paying part-time and temp jobs have increasingly filled the void, and immigrant workers in particular are often forced into extremely poor working conditions.
As we begin to search for answers to Monday’s shooting, it’s crucial that we connect the most visible forms of violence that we witness with the deeper, structural violence that may not be as visible, but that gives rise to these more visible ones all the same.
With unemployment and poverty on the rise, Toronto Mayor Rob Ford voted last January to cut funding for youth outreach workers, and only last month voted against every one of the city’s development grants programs. Harper and McGuinty are also implicated in this deeper violence, as their austerity budgets have hacked at the social programs these communities depend on with quality jobs so scarce.
And quite recently, the Toronto District School Board announced that it was closing eight Toronto schools, two of which are in the Morningside neighbourhood: Heron Park Junior Public School and Peter Secor Junior Public School.
It’s within this context that Monday night’s shooting occurred. The racists and Harper and the “tough-on-crime crowd” have their perspective, but we need to focus the discussion on the systemic reasons for this tragedy. As Scarborough begins to heal from Monday’s trauma, we owe it to the victims and their families to fight for real solutions to gun violence.
Thank you. Let’s place the blame squarely where it belongs, at the lap of the “leaders” who have sold out our communal welfare.
If we are going to place the blame squarely where it belongs, let’s lay it on the shoulders of the perpetrators. I’m willing to bet no one was holding a gun to their heads demanding that they shoot. To use weapons is a choice, plain and simple.
I live on welfare, I am poor and raising my son as a single father. Neither of us feels the need to pick up a gun or join a gang or shoot people. Poverty is not the reason, people are the reason.
Pull up your pants go speak respectfully and go to the free youth employment service or YMCA payed for by our tax dollars, let them help you do up your resume and find you a job, save some money and go to night school to up grade yourself, it’s not that hard. When we have free services like this there is absolutely no excuse to be living a “gangster” lifestyle this Canada not Detroit.
Nobody has said that the shooters are NOT to blame for their actions. Far from it. The police and judicial systems are not doubt plowing resources into tracking down the perpetrators and building the legal case to convict them of murder and attempted murder.
What this article provides is an alternative look at the wider social problems that make hustling – and thus gun violence – an option for people who feel as though they really don’t have control over their own lives in the irrefutably shitty economic and social circumstances laid out here. The systemic arguments about poverty leading to violence do more to explain these problems, both empirically and historically, than the mainstream media discussions of there being no father figures, a “gang culture” and the usual stuff we read in the papers. These problems have been tackled again and again but they fail because they never address poverty directly, ie: getting people jobs.
And maybe, just maybe, we should think about making the drug trade legal so business disputes are sorted out above board and non-violently, instead of with guns. You only need to know a little about prohibition that if you drive an industry underground (an industry that is not going away), then the means of conducting business will be illegal too.
Pingback: Poverty to blame for Scarborough shooting « The Future Lasts Forever